Victorious IV: "Allons-y!"

Most annoying thing about paradoxes, besides the impending reality collapse. 

They make conversations so repetitive.

The Tenth Doctor, Defender of the Daleks

Although some of my purchases in the Doctor Who Time Lord Victorious event weren't available at the time I placed my order, Indigo was able to immediately ship the two stand-alone novels, Engines of War and Combat Magicks, along with the first of the TLV purchases, the Defender of the Daleks graphic novel.  I've booked some extra time off for the holiday season, so I was able to immediately settle down for a leisurely read.

It took me a few chapters to realize that something was bothering me about the first book.  My initial reaction was that it was reasonably well written and that the plot was engaging, with some interesting concepts that fit nicely into the Whoniverse, but it was also somehow a bit flat, a bit lacking – what was missing?

The problem is that essentially, the books are an extension of the television version, which assumes that you’re an ongoing viewer – just as they don’t have to explain who Meredith Grey is at the start of every episode of Grey's Anatomy*, if you don’t know why there’s an obsolete blue police box called a TARDIS that’s bigger on the inside, you’re on your own. 

Obviously I have all of that knowledge, but my subconscious reading mind kept looking for the kind of explanatory exposition that a stand-alone novel would have. (Although, one of the novels breaks some new ground by dealing with the legendary Time War, which has never been fully documented – probably just to give writers some room to work in situations like this.)

The flip side of this coin is that, due to that existing knowledge of the show, it’s impossible not to compare the written Doctors with their live action equivalents – just how well does the character in Defender of the Daleks match up with David Tennant’s performance, or with Jodie Whittaker and John Hurt for the two novels? 

As you might expect, the results vary – there’s a fine line between accuracy and parody when writing someone’s verbal style, and the process is an odd inversion of the usual method, with an author attempting to recreate the actor’s style rather than the actor interpreting a script. In my case, I found that I ended up mentally delivering the lines in the actor’s voice to see if they worked. For the most part, the writers succeeded, although there were a few places in the graphic novel where it didn’t quite feel like David Tennant, and a few places where it felt a bit too much like David Tennant - if that's even possible.

However, all of this is secondary to the real question: WHY DON'T THE DALEKS IN DEFENDER OF THE DALEKS REMEMBER THE GREAT TIME WAR????  It may seem like a trivial time-travel thing to the casual reader, but as a fan, that may well keep me awake tonight. Let's hope they cover that off in one of the books that I'm still waiting for, I'd hate to have to hunt through the entire event in search of the answer.

- Sid

 

* Are there stand-alone Grey's Anatomy books?  Or is that sort of thing restricted to science fiction shows?