Tuesday, January 26, 2021

Virtual Dreams I: Quest

I'm pleased to announce that I've recently received a promotion at work.  Sadly, as is so often the case, my new responsibilities were added onto my old ones rather than replacing them, but at least it came with a notable raise. I generally find it hard to spend money on myself, but I decided that in this case, it was probably acceptable to reward myself for getting ahead.

But what to buy?

I looked at Star Wars Rebellion and Resistance fighter pilot helmets, I looked at Major Matt Mason crawlers on eBay, I looked at original comic book art on the Heritage Auctions web site,  I looked at Alienware gaming systems, but nothing really rang the bell in terms of both price point and geek appeal. 

Finally, after much thought, and much research, I decided that a virtual reality headset would be the ideal SF/geek gift to celebrate my new job description (and paycheque): the culmination of a long-standing interest in virtual reality experiences.

My first experience with VR was in 1994, at a SIGGRAPH (Special Interest Group Graphics) conference in Florida. There were lineups for the two VR demos that were running on the show floor. One was a basic VR port of the original Doom, in all its pixelated 8-bit glory. The other was a simplified version of the speeder bike from The Return of the Jedi, which featured a recumbent bike like the ones in the movie, and a VR landscape populated with simple geometric shapes. Unlike the POV Doom demo, the speeder bike program was a full VR environment, where the headmount allowed a fully tracked 360 view as the bike flashed through the landscape. 

I was fascinated by both of the demos, but sadly neither one was intended for any kind of commercial release, they were just experimental proof-of-concept experiences.

Over the years since then, I’ve had a variety of VR and near-VR experiences – near-VR being defined as things like the Dome-G video presentation at Gundam Front in Tokyo, the Smuggler’s Run ride at Galaxy’s Edge in Disneyland, or flyover rides like the ones in Vancouver and Disneyland’s California Adventure. 

My most recent full-VR experience was the Mission ISS VR program in 2019, featured at the Intrepid Space Shuttle Pavilion on the Intrepid Sea, Air and Space Museum in New York. I loved that brief VR session on - and outside - the International Space Station, to the point where I actually did some research on VR headsets at the time, but finally decided that the cost of a compatible headset and a suitably powerful graphics card was prohibitive.

I may not have done enough research, or, in retrospect, I may have just made the right decision by not buying at that point in time. The Oculus Quest 2 headset that I’ve just ordered from Amazon is the successor to the original Quest, which was released in May of 2019 and would have been available when I was originally looking around.

That first model received mixed reviews, but the Quest 2, which only recently entered the marketplace in October of 2020, seems to be universally viewed as having solved the problems of the original version, reducing weight and increasing the resolution, while managing to bring down its original price point of over $500 CAD to a modest $399.

The upgraded Quest 2 is a stand-alone VR headset, with onboard storage for your game library and the option of using a USB link cable for access to PC games. It comes in 64 GB and 128 GB onboard storage options, but critics agree that the less expensive 64 GB model that I’ve purchased is more than adequate. The headset links with a pair of controllers that act as pointers, hands, guns, and tools in virtual space.

And, a strong vote for the Quest 2, it will run the ISS VR program that I enjoyed in New York, which is available as a free download.

Now that I've placed my order with Amazon, I'm sure that I've made a good choice. After all, VR seems like such an obvious option in the pandemic lockdown environment – what better time to be able to soar in space?

- Sid
 
* I’m also not sure that the original Quest would have run the ISS program, another indicator that a deferred purchase was a prudent decision.

Saturday, January 23, 2021

"Take me out to the ball game..."

As I've established in previous postings, every now and then I have a mild attack of math when I'm watching a movie or reading a book, and end up either going down the rabbit hole or through the looking glass, depending on your preference for Alice novels. Most recently, this happened when I watched the first sneak peak from the upcoming Invincible animated series, scheduled for a March 26th debut on Amazon Prime™ Video.

The clip shows a pair of enhanced beings, father and son, hovering in midair as they throw a baseball back and forth while discussing the challenges of being a superhero.  Because they're superheroes, they're doing it the hard way:  they're throwing the ball AWAY from the other person so that it circumnavigates the planet before being caught.

It's a charming bonding moment, but there's so much extreme physics involved that I couldn't help myself from taking a closer look at what was actually going on.

It takes the baseball approximately 18 seconds to reach the son's glove after the father throws it. (I timed it at 17.98, but let's keep the math simple.)  Given that the Earth's circumference is 40,075 kilometers, distance divided by time gives the baseball a speed of 2226.389 km/s, or 8,014,999 km/hr. (speed per second x60 x60.)  The escape velocity for Earth is a piddly 11.2 km/s, so that baseball is GONE, headed in a straight line for distant horizons: the Moon, Saturn, Alpha Centauri, whatever the first solid object that gets in the way happens to be*.

But, hey, Dad is a superhero, maybe he can put a LOT of spin on the ball or something like that, so we'll generously assume that the baseball doesn't leave the planet.  Regardless, the ball is travelling at 6,542 times the speed of sound, so when Dad asks his son if he hears the ball coming, the son's answer of yes seems impossible, the ball is well out in front of any noise it might be making**.  Superhearing is all well and good, but the sound just can't have arrived yet.

But, once again, superheroes: in the interest of fairness, I freely confess that there may be aspects of superhearing that make this possible, although Clark Kent hasn't answered any of my texts on the topic.

However, at that sort of speed, the adiabatic compression of air in front of the ball is going to severely raise its temperature.  (If you thought that it was the friction of air that caused heating under these circumstances, welcome to the club, it took me a lot of misdirected searching on Google™ to realize my mistake.)  At this point, the math gets complicated, but we can take a lateral approach. 

Spacecraft re-entering the Earth's atmosphere are travelling at approximately 25 times the speed of sound (the compression effect doesn't really kick in until you're over the speed of sound, just as a side note for the interested student).  This produces temperatures of about 1480 degrees C.  The baseball has a much smaller surface area, but it's also travelling at 262 times that speed, and since leather starts to burn at 212 degrees C., it's unlikely that it survives very long on its trip around the world.

Not only that, but that's gotta be a pretty sturdy baseball glove, too.  And there's your homework, class: how much energy is released by a baseball travelling at 6,432 times the speed of sound when it hits a solid object? Just to get things started, a standard Major League baseball must weight between 5 and 5 1⁄4 ounces, or 142 and 149 grams.  And, as always, please show your work.

- Sid
 
* Less dramatic if it hits a bird, although I suppose it would be very dramatic from the bird's perspective, albeit for an extremely short period of time.

** Such as a really epic sonic boom, perhaps.
 

Friday, January 22, 2021

Na na na na na na na na na na na na na.


Yep...$1,297,500.  First appearance of the Batman, if you're wondering about the significance.  

You have to wonder what the story is for this single selection from that long-passed 1939 print run  - whether it was originally purchased by a child or an adult, how many owners it's had since then, why it's up for sale now, and when the last time was that someone just opened the pages and read the story inside.

- Sid
 

Sunday, January 17, 2021

In the Ocean of the Night.

As long-time readers will be aware, I have had an ongoing issue with the Space channel showing non-genre content, like Jaws, for example - an excellent movie, well acted, certainly deserving of its 1976 People's Choice Award, but really, not a science fiction film by any stretch of the imagination. 

Sadly, new management hasn't brought change in this particular area: tonight, CTV's Sci-Fi Channel, the heir to Space, is showing a double feature: Ocean's 11 and Ocean's 12

I'm sorry, did I miss something in the plot breakdowns for these two movies? Does George Clooney perform one or both of the heists by telekinesis, or by walking through a wall?  (No, wait, that's The Men Who Stare At Goats, which might at least marginally qualify for the Sci-Fi channel, at least compared to the Ocean franchise.) 


The joke, if there is one, is that it would have been quite easy to do a triple feature of science fiction films featuring the principals: leaving goats out of it, we could have watched Mr. Clooney in Solaris or Gravity, Brad Pitt in Ad Astra or his brilliant Golden Globe-winning performance in 12 Monkeys, and Matt Damon in The Martian or Elysium.*   

Sigh ... okay, CTV?  I give up - if we absolutely have to do this, you know, I may actually prefer sharks.

- Sid
 
* Oh, heck, let's make a day out of it:  Julia Roberts in Flatliners - had to dig deep for that one; Casey Affleck in Light of My Life or Interstellar; Don Cheadle in Mission to Mars, Iron Man 2 or 3, or Captain America: Civil War; Elliot Gould in Capricorn 1- sorry, drawing a blank on Carl Reiner, but it's still a full schedule.
 

Friday, January 1, 2021

Resolved.


I think that we're all happy to bid a heartfelt farewell to 2020 - it's not a common sentiment for January 1st, but thank god THAT'S over with.  A new year and a fresh start is now upon us, and with it, the traditional time for resolutions intended to address flaws, perceived or actual, and thereby improve one's person and personality.

However, let's start the process with the equally traditional confession of failure regarding past resolutions. I have to admit that I didn't fully complete last year's resolution to catalogue my book collection (with the concomitant task of replacing the more battered selections). 

As always when someone doesn't follow through with their New Year's commitment, I can provide a list of half-hearted explanations and excuses:  we moved in the middle of the year, packing for which temporarily removed access to my collection and broke my flow; COVID-19 limited my access to bookstores for replacement purchases; work overload in the fourth quarter made me more likely to lie on the bed after work than type the titles of books; and, surprisingly during a pandemic, more social activity on the weekend as Karli's sister Stefanie, the non-resident single member of our bubble, started coming over for weekend dinners on a more regular basis.

All that aside, I did manage to get as far as the M section of the bookshelves, and overall, it was an incredibly valuable exercise in terms of cleaning up my library.  My only regret is that I didn't log the number of replacement books that I've purchased, although I could probably make a reasonable estimate, given that most of the books went to other people rather than the donations bin.  (In a couple of cases, the texts being replaced were in such bad shape that I recycled them*, but only a few books suffered that particular fate.)  

Not only has it been valuable in terms of maintenance, but it's surprisingly enjoyable. I know that sounds like a very geek statement, and yes, there was a certain aspect of drudgery to it, but as a lover of books, it was a wonderful opportunity to get back in touch with overlooked favourites and forgotten treasures.

As such, I've decided to let last year's resolution ride for a second year. After all, if it took 12 months to get as far as M, it makes perfect sense to take another 12 months to get to Z.  (After which I'll have to do the hardcovers, but still.)  Yep, that's the plan...and I'm sure I'll get started on that any time now...

- Sid
 
* It's very unusual to throw away a book, it somehow feels almost criminal.