- George Lucas
Let's face it, eventually someone will remake the Star Wars movies. Some latter-day Peter Jackson - sigh, or J. J. Abrams - will take upon themselves the monumental task of applying a different vision to George Lucas' epic but admittedly imperfect magnum opus.
This as yet unborn revisionist will obviously make changes, large and small. They'll rewrite the dialogue (please God), make Jar Jar Binks less of an annoying stereotype, fix the gaffe about parsecs, and lose all of that midi-chlorian nonsense.
Larger decisions will alter the entire direction of the series. The simple choice as to whether Han shoots first is just the first step in establishing a different moral or psychological direction for the saga. Emphasize the incestuous romance between Luke and Leia, and you suddenly have a subplot right out of Greek tragedy à la Oedipus, or a reference to Arthurian legend.
But all of these questions pale beside the really big one: in what order do you tell the story?
The existing IV - V - VI - I - II - III sequence is a matter of circumstances more than planning. However elaborate the existing combination of movies, comics, novels and animation may be, at the time of the release of the first movie George Lucas was completely unaware that he was initiating a franchise.
Our future auteur has an open field, though. Personally, my vote is for starting the series with The Phantom Menace. In fact, in my version, the Anakin Skywalker that Qui-gon Jinn discovers is a dark child more reminiscent of Damian than Beaver Cleaver, an object of fear and suspicion in the slums of Mos Espa, perhaps winning the pod race through an unseen act of cruelty in the wastes of Tatooine.
In this version, we would actually see some of the anger and fear that dissuaded Yoda from wanting to accept Anakin. He would be like a caged demon at the Jedi Academy, wounding or even slaying his fellow padawans in training, but like a demon in power and skill, as well, towering over even the members of the Jedi Council in his abilities with the Force. But of course he would - Anakin is after all the Chosen One - or is he? The Council would be in a constant state of turmoil over the saviour/savage in their midst.
And then...love. The possibility of redemption, a time of peace and happiness with Padme. But eventually Anakin succumbs to destiny and turns to the Dark Side - part Jesus, part Judas, he contains the seeds of his own betrayal, but still manages to topple the Jedi knighthood before falling to Obi-Wan in battle.
From that point, Luke's role becomes that of the true Chosen One - the irony being that the Chosen One is in fact a child on a faraway desert planet, but it's Anakin's son, not Anakin himself. The odd thing about Luke as he is portrayed in the original movie is that there's not even a hint of his eventual mastery of the Force. Surely there should be some clue in his childhood, some sign of buried talent other than a knack for being able to bullseye womp rats. Since we already know that Ben Kenobi is on Tatooine to watch over Luke, my version allows him to become involved in Luke's early fumbling attempts to tap into his abilities.
With Anakin's story already established, we see Obi-Wan's lie about the death of Luke's father for exactly that, a lie, and in the attack on the Death Star Luke's initial survival is caused by a moment of hesitation on the part of Darth Vader, unwilling to kill his son. Unlike his father, Luke is able to deny the temptation of the Dark Side, and his time with Yoda allows the agèd master to redeem his failure with Anakin.
And in the final reel, we would see the culmination of the struggle between saviour and betrayer, Christ and Antichrist, as the Emperor watches, gloating and smirking, a figure of Satanic temptation for the younger Skywalker as to his father. And, as with Satan, we see him cast into the abyss at the climax of the battle. Finally, rather than a teddy bear picnic, the closing scenes would show Luke welcoming the first class of younglings to the reborn Jedi Temple, as the greenscreen figures of Yoda, Obi-Wan and his father look on with approval.
Or you could just do it as a comedy. More Jar Jar Binks, more R2-D2 noises, more cute romantic arguments between Leia and Han, and something falls on Chewbacca's head every ten minutes. The elements that allow for my altered view of the plotline are certainly in the existing story but then so are the ones that would allow for something as ridiculous as, oh, having Ewoks win the war.
The Tim Burton Star Wars would be worth seeing Dorothy
ReplyDeleteI wish to publicly thank my sister for setting the bar so high for future comments - I have high hopes for an eventual guest post on Ace Doubles from her, too.
ReplyDelete- Sid
No, the Star Wars series should NOT be redone as a comedy! That would seem disrespectful. If anything, it could be turned into a season series, with more material added to fill in the gaps the movies leave or the areas they pass over too quickly. If such as series was well done, it could even rival CSI Miami for prime time popularity, albeit on the Space Channel.
ReplyDeleteWell, it is being done as a series right now, albeit as a computer animated one. The Clone Wars series is in its second season, I think - I catch an episode now and then but I haven't followed it closely. They did a conventionally animated one a few years back as well, and if you go back to the 80s, there were the Droids and Ewoks shows, which were admittedly aimed at a younger audience.
ReplyDeleteDone as a prime time live action series, it might well end up as the same sort of thing as the Battlestar Galactica "re-imagining", a much grimmer approach to the original storyline.
- Sid
I would agree that George Lucas is not a great writer. Don't get me wrong, the movies are great eye candy, particularly the first triune of films, and particularly considering when they were produced. I worked for some years as an optical camera operator and so know something about the production of images on film at that time (before all this digital stuff came to the forefront), starting with the original photography, then the production of lith mattes, rotoscoping, even the painstaking process of cutting out ruby lith in order to separate photographic elements from the backgrounds. And then you have to put the whole lot back into the film. A lot of work and Lucas and his team has done it exceedingly well. I used to watch the early movies and only occasionally notice the slightest hint of the, I guess it's called artifacts, around the edges of the elements that were combined into a whole (like the smaller space ships against the background of 'space') but that was in part because I was looking for them too.
ReplyDeleteI also used to read Cinefex magazines on a regular basis. I loved all the models and the attention to detail that went into making and shooting them for films. I still have a number of them here, including a couple featuring Star Wars and Industrial Light & Magic. They were wonderful. So, as you can see, I like eye candy, but it only takes you so far. I found that, after a couple of films, I started to lose interest in the 'Star Wars' saga. I have seen but didn't go all goo gah over the later films. The images were still great but I found the story lines lacking and so lost interest. I also haven't watched them repeatedly like I did the first, well, three really, the initial releases.
His saga has all the elements of a fine oater (now coined 'space opera') with all the attendant cliches and characters from that genre too; where good triumphs over evil because it is nicer, where there is the comic side-kick, the hero who gets the girl, and a cast of villainous, well, villains, and lovable yet wonky characters. The plots certainly haven't kept pace with technological developments and I find that the films, still adhere to all the tired old cliches (yes, I know, even if I'm using tired cliches to describe it) and that Lucas hasn't really delved into the richness of the world(s) he has created, as wonderfully elucidated by Sid. And I agree with much of his commentary and so I won't repeat it here.
All I wish to add is that I think over time a person, like myself, develops expectations from the media like film. I mean we see just see so much of it in our culture(including, of course, all the time spent in front of the 'Glass Teat' as Harlan Ellison coined the term) and have become critical of the language which is spoken there. I think we bore easily these days. We want to be surprised as we are entertained, and as we grow older we become a bit jaded with the repetition of an old formula. We're not kids anymore and so we want, or at least I want, to have a more adult or real storyline to follow (and here, of course, to an admittedly arbitrary given value of 'adult' or of 'real' because, let's face it, it's still not reality itself).