Sunday, September 25, 2011

Thud and blunder.



Due to my recent European adventure, I didn’t go to see the recent movie reboot of Conan the Barbarian, but then, apparently neither did anyone else.  In fact, it seems to have come and gone in surprisingly short order for an epic big-budget heroic fantasy summer release.

So what went wrong?

Personally, I think that there’s some kind of fundamental barrier which can prevent an author’s work from being successfully adapted. The continued interest in Robert E. Howard’s barbarian hero would seem to indicate that there's some merit to the character, but as with Frank Herbert’s Dune and apparently everything by William Gibson, it may not be all that easy to transfer that obvious merit to another medium.

The barrier in all three of these examples is the same: style. Howard’s prose may be a bit extreme, but it paints a detailed tapestry, loaded with visual and sensory clues, placing Conan - and the reader - in a world which is rich, tactile, and real

Howard described the genesis of his Cimmerian warrior in similar terms:
It may sound fantastic to link the term "realism" with Conan; but as a matter of fact - his supernatural adventures aside - he is the most realistic character I ever evolved.  He is simply a combination of a number of men I have known, and I think that's why he seemed to step full-grown into my consciousness when I wrote the first yarn of the series.  Some mechanism in my sub-conscious took the dominant characteristics of various prize-fighters, gunmen, bootleggers, oil field bullies, gamblers and honest workmen I have come in contact with, and combining them all, produced the amalgamation I call Conan the Cimmerian.
For a true look at the character of Conan and the manner in which Howard describes him and his world, I strongly recommend reading a couple of the original stories featuring the character. Please note the word “original” – as I’ve already discussed, Conan has travelled quite a long way from home over the years since Robert E. Howard’s creation of the character.

Fortunately, much of Howard's work is now available as free downloads on Project Gutenberg.  Recommended reading would be the short stories Red Nails, Across the Black River, or A Witch Shall Be Born. If you're looking for a longer experience, try The Hour of the Dragon, a book-length work originally published as a five-part serial in the pulp magazine Weird Tales.

The bottom line is that any attempt at adaptation ends up being a second-hand description, someone trying to find a way to evoke through imitation the same degree of creative depth that they see in the original work. I suppose it's like a band doing cover songs: regardless of the quality of the performance, it's always going to be based upon - and compared to - someone else's unique genius.  Let's face it - imitation may be the sincerest form of flattery, but that doesn't make it the best form.
- Sid

1 comment:

  1. The difference between Dune and Conan is that Lynch actually attempted to adapt the source material. All the main characters, the basic plot outline, the themes, the setting and the ideas from the novel are put there on the screen: sure, you have additions like the Navigator transplanted from Dune Messiah and weird Lynchian inventions like the Harkonnen heart plugs, but it's still recognizably an adaptation of Frank Herbert's Dune.

    There's no such attempt with the Conan film. Aside from Conan himself and a few names, nothing is from Howard's stories, be it the supporting characters, locations or ideas. In fact, none of the supposed Robert E. Howard adaptations to be theatrically released actually adapt the stories, so much as take the character and make up their own.

    Until someone actually attempts to adapt a Howard story, we can't really say Howard's work can't be adapted at all. The Marvel and Dark Horse comics didn't seem to have any problems, and they have both sales and critical acclaim backing them up. The stumbling block here isn't Howard, it's the Hollywood system thinking they know what makes a better story than one of the most influential fantasy writers of the 20th century.

    ReplyDelete