Sunday, February 27, 2011

To be fair, she's a Star Wars fan.


Fun will now commence.
Seven of Nine, Star Trek: Voyager
The cruise portion of my 50th birthday trip is now booked, and on Saturday Laurie gave me a large glossy brochure detailing the various wonders available on the ship which will be moving us about the Mediterranean for seven days.

"We'll be travelling on Voyager," she said, and then gave me a strange look after my resulting burst of laughter.  (Let's not forget that Laurie has never watched very much television, let alone any of the Star Trek: Next Generation spinoffs from a few years back.)


A little investigation reveals that the United Federation of Planet's farthest flung explorer and the Royal Caribbean Cruise Line's floating hotel are very nearly the same length, with the USS Voyager measuring in at 1020 feet, and the Voyager of the Seas coming in at 1128 feet.  It's an interesting comparison, because very often it's difficult to get a sense of scale for the various starships, battle stations and orbital platforms that one sees in science fiction movies and television shows.  To be honest, I expected to discover that USS Voyager was considerably smaller than its aquatic namesake, and the information that they're the same length considerably alters my impression of the starship based on my actual experience of cruise ships.

Someone has already attempted to sort out the various questions of scale in science fiction - take a look at Jeff Russell's Starship Dimensions site for an impressive comparison of the various ships, shuttles and suits from over the years.  (Apparently there's a noteworthy difference between the observed size of the Imperial AT-ATs in The Empire Strike Back and the height listed by Lucasfilms.)

For myself, I've now got an entirely different expectation for the cruise:  I see Captain Janeway standing resolutely on the bridge as we dock at Cannes, Neelix manning the breakfast buffet, and, of course, there's the titillating prospect of bumping into Seven of Nine in the gym.  What more could a science fiction fan want?*
- Sid

* Actually, that's not as strange as it sounds.  (Okay, it's almost that strange.)  If your dream is to spend a few days in the Caribbean with some of your favourite Star Trek actors, your dream can come true.  Visit http://www.startrekcruise.com/ for more information.
 

Saturday, February 26, 2011

Happy Birthday to...us? Me? It?



Today marks the 4th birthday of The Infinite Revolution.  Gosh, how times flies...

According to the stats provided by Google™, which apparently do not include anything before May of 2010 (lord knows why), TIR has enjoyed 6,842 page views over the last ten months. I wonder what explains the meteoric rise in interest which I seem to have experienced according to the chart on the Overview page?

Regardless, if I'm getting that many page views, I'd like some of you other visitors to leave a comment now and then!  It seems unfair to put all the pressure on Chris, Colin, Dorothy, and Laurie.  Step up to the plate, world!
- Sid

P.S.  Although, I do have to express my sincere gratitude to the four people listed above for their ongoing interest.  Thanks a lot to all of you.
 

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

The End of the World (as we know it.)


I’ll get trip insurance in case Europe collapses before we embark on our cruise. You never know.
- Laurie Smith
I'll be turning 50 this year, and to celebrate this milestone I've decided to take a three-week trip to Europe.  For part of the journey, I'll be joined by the tanned and toned Laurie Smith, who agreed to make a guest appearance provided that we do a cruise around the Mediterranean. In spite of some initial misgivings (I've had some negative cruise experiences, as some of you know) I looked over the options for ports of call and so forth, and now I'm on board, so to speak.

Ms. Smith is taking care of cruise arrangements, and when asked if I wanted trip insurance, I refused, on the basis that if I miss this trip, there will be far larger problems in my life than the cost of a week on the Med.  Her reply is the opening quote.

At this point in time, the theme of a post-apocalyptic world has been solidly established in our cultural matrix via novels, games, movies and comics.   We all know what it would be like, whether caused by a thermonuclear exchange or lack of gasoline: governments cease to exist, society falls apart, it's every man for himself, despair prevails, and eventually it's nothing but cannibalism, filed teeth, bad tattoos, odd bits of armour made out of car tires and spikes, and everyone gets mohawks.

Would they? Really? Why? Could there be a disaster on a such a scale that it would actual overwhelm our civilization's ability to repair itself? (Or at least to provide decent haircuts.)


Maybe yes, maybe no. We've had some oddly telling incidents in recent years. For example, I visited New Orleans a year after the hurricane blew through, and there were places in the city and along the coast, as above, that had an uneasy resemblance to sets from an after-the-war science fiction movie. Even today, over five years later, they're still cleaning up derelict houses in one of the best-known cities in the United States.*

The Russian city of Chernobyl is now a ghost town, and could easily be the poster child for anyone who wants to show how a city looks 30 years after The End. Haiti a year post-earthquake? People are still living amidst, and in some cases in, piles of rubble while agencies attempt to make any sort of headway in the process of cleanup, let alone rebuilding.

I realize that all these examples are isolated one-off events rather than disaster on a planetary scale, but that makes the slow recovery time even more noteworthy. These are pins in a map, surrounded by an entire planet's worth of options in terms of technology and helping hands, and yet the process has taken place at a snail's pace, or, in the case of Chernobyl, not at all. Now imagine a global catastrophe: big meteorite, nuclear war, rogue disease vector, whatever you like, I think we all have our favourites.

Personally, I see the global pandemic option as the most plausible.  Imagine a slightly mutated version of Ebola Zaire, airborne rather than transmitted through infected blood, a slow enough killer that victims have enough time to spread the contagion around the planet before starting to bleed out.  How would the world handle a crisis of that magnitude? 

Who knows? Maybe we'd make the unfortunate discovery that civilization, like any other artificial structure, falls apart when you get rid of enough of the foundations.
- Sid

* My reaction at the time was that something must have gone horribly wrong in the United States. Can you imagine a city having to rely on volunteer labour and church groups to rebuild itself during the Eisenhower or Kennedy eras?
 

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Surprisingly, Amazon.com DOES have this one.


3 Seconds Before Explosion DVD (NTSC Region 1)
Three Seconds to Explosion connects Nikkatsu’s “mood action” yakuza gangster films of the 50’s and 60’s to the studio’s subsequent kinky 70’s “pink films,” and is a primer in the tough, super-cool world of “no borders” exploitation cinema Nikkatsu style.

- From the Diabolik DVD catalogue.
As a followup to my post on the Solomon Kane movie, I have just finished the online purchase of an All Regions DVD version of the film from a distributor in New Jersey. Actually, the term "distributor" might be insulting, I gather that the happy people at Diabolik DVD don't think of themselves in those sort of mainstream corporate terms. But, credit where credit is due, if you're looking for something that you KNOW Amazon.com would never stock in a million years, these guys probably have it. 

But what in the world is a "mood action" yakuza film?
- Sid
 

Monday, February 21, 2011

The Mark of Kane.



The whole thing started with one of those odd leaps for which the internet has become famous. You know, those The Carpenter and the Walrus moments when you're looking at shoes and ships and sealing wax and end up doing a search for cabbages and kings?

In this case, it started on one of those list sites, the ones that show you galleries of "Disney for Adults" or tell you "The Top 10 Things You Didn’t Know About Sperm".*  I honestly don't remember what the list that caught my eye was dealing with, but the keynote image was from the movie adaptation of Solomon Kane, and it occurred to me that although I knew that a film version had been in production, I'd never seen the results anywhere. Surely it must have been released by now, I thought.

So off I went in search of Solomon Kane.

For those of you unfamiliar with the name, Solomon Kane is perhaps the second best known creation of pulp author Robert E. Howard - his best known, of course, being Conan the Barbarian.  Unlike Conan, Kane's adventures are set in the more familiar historical venue of Elizabethan England, although many of Kane's adventures take place in Northern Africa, where he fights vampires, zombies, and (of course) nameless things from before the dawn of Time.  

Solomon Kane, as described by Howard in Red Shadows**, the character's August 1928 Weird Tales debut, was:
A tall man, as tall as Le Loup he was, clad in black from head to foot, in plain, close-fitting garments that somehow suited the somber face. Long arms and broad shoulders betokened the swordsman, as plainly as the long rapier in his hand. The features of the man were saturnine and gloomy. A kind of dark pallor lent him a ghostly appearance in the uncertain light, an effect heightened by the satanic darkness of his lowering brows. Eyes, large, deep-set and unblinking, fixed their gaze upon the bandit, and looking into them, Le Loup was unable to decide what color they were. Strangely, the mephistophelean trend of the lower features was offset by a high, broad forehead, though this was partly hidden by a featherless hat.

That forehead marked the dreamer, the idealist, the introvert, just as the eyes and the thin, straight nose betrayed the fanatic.
This fanatical idealist, armed with rapier and flintlock, appeared in twelve short stories and three poems, and like Conan made the leap to comic adaptations many years ago.  On that basis, it would seem only a matter of time before the movie world turned its gaze upon this grim Puritan righter of wrongs, who at least offers script writers a bit more depth and complexity than his barbarian colleague.

However, as with Conan, there's always that possibility that the character might have suffered in translation, so I decided to look for an evaluation copy online before investing in a DVD or Blu-ray version. A little casual investigation revealed that the film had premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival in 2009, which seemed like more than enough time for a few bootleg versions to have made their way to the Internet. Now, normally in these situations one is spoiled for choice, and in a way, I was, but not in the usual way.

First I downloaded what turned out to be a very nicely dubbed Russian version, passed on innumerable French and Spanish copies, then found an English version which, although it weighed in at an acceptable 1.2 GB, was a terrible copy made by shooting the screen of a TV set, and finally found a reasonably good English version - which lost sync on the sound about an hour in. Then there was the French version subtitled in Korean...

Okay, obviously something is up here.

Having booked the day off in an attempt to use up vacation time from 2010, I decided to bite the bullet, trot over to FutureShop on Broadway and satisfy my curiosity by purchasing a copy. Or so I thought. Nothing on the shelf in either the DVD or Blu-ray sections, not even a Solomon Kane divider.  Okay, so off downtown to HMV. Nope, not there, either. Just on spec, I checked the downtown FutureShop - nothing again.

With a bit of a frustrated frown, I returned home to purchase a copy online, only to discover that there was nothing on either amazon.ca or chapters.indigo.ca.  Ironically, you can buy fifteen different versions of the movie poster on amazon.ca, but not the actual movie.  Amazon.com had a DVD version, but only in a European region code, nothing that would play on a North American player.

Subsequent investigation revealed that not only had there not been a North American theatrical release, the scheduled Region 1 DVD release date of June 2010 seemed to have come and gone without result as well. I also discovered that the movie was produced in a co-operative British-French-Czech effort, which might explain why North American distributors had turned their back on it as a "foreign" film, in spite of good reviews, acceptable box office, and noteworthy DVD sales overseas - in fact, Solomon Kane was the top selling DVD and Blu-ray disk for its first week of release in the UK.


My impression from the various downloaded versions was that although unfortunately the plot of the movie version isn't derived directly from any of the original Howard stories, the film admirably captures the spirit of the character. Unlike most heroic fantasy movies, it takes itself completely seriously - there are no bumbling sidekicks, no slapstick humour, and lead actor James Purefoy offers a convincing and believable portrayal of a man who has attempted to redeem himself by turning his back on violence and returning to his faith, but who abandons that attempt in order to save an innocent.  If I had to sum it up, the creators of the movie handled their material with respect, which is not a statement I'd feel comfortable making in regards to 90% of the fantasy movies that I've seen (Peter Jackson's treatment of The Lord of the Rings being an obvious exception.)

And maybe that's the reason for its lack of acceptance in the North American market. Fantasy and science fiction author Ursula K. LeGuin once wrote an article entitled Why are Americans Afraid of Dragons? in which she talks about what she sees as a basic American distrust of fantasy, or at least of fantasy as an aspect of adult life, which would go a long way to explain Van Helsing, The Scorpion King, or the Conan movies, with their self-conscious nudge-nudge-wink-wink approach to the genre.

Is Solomon Kane a brilliant fantasy movie? No, not really, as far as I can tell it doesn't rise very far above its roots in 1920s pulp fiction. But it's a serious fantasy movie, and that if nothing else should deserve a little recognition.
- Sid

* Just for the record, I was there for "Starcraft II Wallpapers".  Frankly, I feel that I know all that I really need to know about sperm, thank you.

** Available as a free download at:  http://manybooks.net/titles/howardrother07Red_Shadows.html